Skip to content

Software testing guides for professional testers

Practitioner-grade reference guides on test management, test automation, agile testing and testing techniques, each built around the numbers, tables and figures a test lead would put in a slide. And the honest archive of Testing Experience, the magazine that carried this name from 2008 to 2014.

The hubs

53 current guides in five hubs, plus the record of all 28 issues of the magazine that carried this name from 2008 to 2014. No guide names a vendor, carries an affiliate link or sets a cookie.
MarkHubWhat it coversSize
Test Management GuidesPlanning, strategy, risk, estimation, process and the numbers that justify all of it. Seven guides for the person who has to decide what gets tested, by whom, for how long, and then defend the decision.7 guides
Test Automation GuidesWhat to automate, in which layer, with what kind of tool, and how to keep the suite trustworthy once it exists. Six guides on the engineering side of testing, written to stay true as products come and go.6 guides
Agile Testing GuidesHow testing works when there is no test phase. Six guides on the tester's role, the collaborative practices that replace hand-offs, and the artefacts (charters, example tables, a definition of done) that keep quality visible sprint after sprint.6 guides
Software Testing Techniques GuidesThe techniques themselves: how to design cases that find defects with the fewest tests, how to test security, performance and mobile behaviour, and how to measure what the testing achieved. Seven guides, each with a worked example.7 guides
Testing AI Systems and Authenticity PipelinesTesting applied to the systems that claim to prove who made a piece of content, how it was made and whether it was altered or generated. Twenty-seven guides: detector benchmarks, base rates, thresholds and intervals on one side; Content Credentials pipelines, metadata survival, disclosure labels and evidence-grade test records on the other.27 guides
Testing Experience Magazine: The ArchiveFrom March 2008 to December 2014, Testing Experience was a free quarterly PDF magazine for professional testers, published in Berlin. This hub records all 28 issues, the tutorial series and the sister title, and explains what happened to the subscriptions.28 issues, 12 records

Latest figures

Every guide opens with a figure built from its own numbers. The three newest.

Figure 1A reproducible test run in six steps, from pinning the inputs to a second team rerunning from the manifest
A reproducible test run in six steps, from pinning the inputs to a second team rerunning from the manifestPinversions, seedsHashset, promptsRunfrom manifestHash outputsraw resultsManifestone recordRerunsecond teamthe manifest is the product of the run; the rate is a number computed from it
Six steps of a reproducible run. Inputs are pinned and hashed before execution, outputs after it, and the manifest tying them together is what a second team reruns from. From Reproducibility: test results with provenance you can rerun.
Figure 2Items by source category in a 2,000-document evaluation set (invented counts)
Items by source category in a 2,000-document evaluation set (invented counts)500100015002000Attested human, draft history420Dated pre-generator archive610Rater-labelled web text340Generated, logged prompt480Generated, prompt not kept150
Invented but realistic counts. Only the first two categories, 1,030 of 2,000 items, carry a human-written label established by a method other than opinion. From Data lineage for evaluation sets: provenance of test data.
Figure 3Evidence items by type in one release, and how many kept an unbroken custody chain (worked example)
Evidence items by type in one release, and how many kept an unbroken custody chain (worked example)50100Screenshots118Application logs64Detector reports48Exported datasets12Packet captures9C2PA validation outputs30
Invented but realistic counts. Bars show items with an unbroken chain against items produced; 281 of 312 kept the chain. From Chain of custody for test evidence: logs to signed reports.

Most read guides

The pages people search for most: plans, security, the pyramid, exploratory sessions, done, performance.

What this site is

Testing Experience was a free quarterly magazine for professional software testers, published in Berlin across 28 issues between March 2008 and December 2014. Its issue files were shared on security mailing lists, cited on developer blogs, catalogued by research repositories and summarized by tester communities in a dozen languages. Publication stopped in 2014 and the site lapsed a few years later. In 2026 the domain was relaunched, under new and independent ownership, as the knowledge base you are reading: the same audience, the same subject, a format that is open all the time instead of four times a year behind a registration wall.

The guides are organized into the four themes the magazine returned to most, plus a fifth hub, testing AI systems and authenticity pipelines, that applies the same methods to classifiers, detectors, language-model features and the provenance systems (Content Credentials, file metadata, disclosure labels) that claim to show who made a piece of content and whether it was altered or generated. Each guide opens with a figure or a table rather than a preamble, carries a quick answer and the key figures in a card beside the text, states its sources by name, and answers the five to seven questions people actually search for on the subject. None of them names a vendor or a product, because tool landscapes turn over and the reasoning should not. Every page carries the name of the editor responsible for it and the month it was last reviewed.

If you arrived here from an old link to an issue PDF, a subscribe page or a tutorial listing, the redirect brought you to the page that most honestly matches what the link pointed to: an issue record that says who cited that issue and why, or the current guide on the same subject. The magazine hub explains the archive; the about page explains who runs the site now and how it is edited.

The magazine, by the numbers

The eight most linked issues; the issue index has all 28.
IssueDateOriginal fileRef. domainsTheme as cited
Issue 1March 2008testingexperience01_08.pdfissues/testingexperience01_03_08.pdf21Launch issue; test management articles
Issue 4December 2008testingexperience04_08.pdfissues/testingexperience04_12_08.pdf21not established
Issue 12December 2010testingexperience12_12_10.pdfissues/testingexperience12_12_10.pdf19Open source testing tools
Issue 6June 2009testingexperience02_09.pdfissues/testingexperience06_06_09.pdf15Security testing
Issue 7September 2009testingexperience03_09.pdfissues/testingexperience07_09_09.pdf15Agile testing
Issue 13March 2011testingexperience13_03_11.pdfissues/testingexperience13_03_11.pdf14Test domains
Issue 19September 2012testingexperience19_09_12.pdfissues/testingexperience19_09_12.pdf14not established
Issue 23September 2013issues/testingexperience23_09_13.pdf13Product review

Common questions

Who is this site for?

Working software testers, test leads and test managers who know the vocabulary and want specific, checkable guidance with figures and sources, not introductions to what testing is.

Is this the Testing Experience magazine?

It is the same domain and name, relaunched in 2026 under independent ownership. The magazine stopped in 2014. This site keeps an evidence-based record of every issue and publishes current guides on its subjects; it does not distribute the original PDFs.

Why are there no tool names in the guides?

Tool landscapes change every few years and vendor mentions date a page. The guides describe categories, criteria and reasoning so that they stay true; the evaluation checklists help you judge any specific tool.

Does this site cover AI detection and content authenticity?

Yes, as a testing subject. The testing AI systems hub measures detectors, watermarks, Content Credentials pipelines and disclosure labels with evaluation sets, thresholds and confidence intervals. It never claims that any of those systems is reliable, never claims that any tool defeats them, and reviews no products.

How are the guides reviewed?

Each is written and reviewed by the named editor against current standards (ISO/IEC/IEEE 29119, ISTQB syllabi, TMMi) and the books cited in its sources list, and shows its last review month. Corrections are welcome through the contribute page.

Can I reuse the figures and tables?

Yes, for internal documents, training and presentations, with a credit to testingexperience.com. See the terms page for the full permission.